If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied for private spaces and for the Internet?
10.06.2025 01:40
Threats of violence
Child pornography
False advertising
Swimming world body to banish athletes and supporters of doping-fueled event in Las Vegas - AP News
Trade secrets
Conspiracy
You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Why am I not getting any atheists to debate with? Are they scared?
No freedom is absolute.
HIPAA violations
That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.
You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.
Insider trading
Insurrection
Stroll needed "urgent medical attention" for pain after qualifying - FIA · F1 - RaceFans
If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.
Revenge porn
Freedom of speech does not apply to:
Perjury
Terroristic threats
Revealing classified information
Exclusive | EchoStar Prepares Potential Bankruptcy Filing Amid FCC Review - WSJ
And much, much more.
Fraud